As many of you have discussed, in Hutcheon’s focus on Carmen
when she dissected the when and where in the context of adaptations helped me
to understand the power that context actually has. What I found particularly intriguing
was the discussion of racializing/deracializing. Specifically, when Hutcheon
discusses the power of the actress (or actor) that they have on the way an
adaptation perceives was a point that I had never thought about it. In her
text, she talks about casting Beyoncé or Madonna as the role of Carmen, and
clearly, these women would cast extremely polar contexts. It reminded me of the
previous text about film analysis where they discussed the power that stars
bring into movies. As Madeline noted about Sherlock, sometimes it is simply the
face of an actress/actor that can attract many viewers, and by that power
films, television shows, plays, operas – whatever adaptation of the sort can
gain status and significance at a particular time simply because of who is the
lead role. What does this say about society? To me, it reveals how we are
driven to be mesmerized by the “Hollywood star” still, and how the attraction
and sometimes obsession of celebrities can influence us to perceive things in
ways we normally wouldn’t (for instance, people saying a really crappy movie is
awesome just because some big shot name is in it). Evidently, the role of
casting is more imperative to me than I realized, and in the future I look
forward to analyzing why directors decide to cast whom they do.
No comments:
Post a Comment